European Journal of Cultural Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGuigan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
European Journal of Cultural Studies, Vol. 8, No. 4, 427-443 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1367549405057827
© 2005 SAGE Publications

The Cultural Public Sphere

Jim McGuigan

Loughborough University, j.t.mcguigan{at}lboro.ac.uk

Media research that uses the concept of a public sphere in order to measure distortion against its ideal standard of dialogic democracy tends to concentrate upon the cognitive aspects of news and either ignores or disdains affective communications. Jurgen Habermas's original formulation distinguished between the literary and the political public spheres. While everyday news was a feature of the political public sphere, the literary public sphere was not so constrained journalistically by current events and provided an arena for deeper reflection. This article updates the notion of a literary public sphere into an expanded concept of the cultural public sphere, including the whole range of media and popular culture. This concept refers to the articulation of politics, public and personal, as a contested terrain through affective (aesthetic and emotional) modes of communication. Three typical political stances in relation to the cultural public sphere are identified and evaluated: uncritical populism, radical subversion and critical intervention.

Key Words: affective communications • critical intervention • cultural publicsphere • radical subversion • uncritical populism


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cultural SociologyHome page
P. Jones
Beyond the Semantic 'Big Bang': Cultural Sociology and an Aesthetic Public Sphere
Cultural Sociology, March 1, 2007; 1(1): 73 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 European Journal of Cultural StudiesHome page
J. Hartley and J. Green
The public sphere on the beach
European Journal of Cultural Studies, August 1, 2006; 9(3): 341 - 362.
[Abstract] [PDF]